Wikipedia Do All New Articles Have to Be Reviewed
 | New pages patrol/Reviewers Welcome to New pages patrol/Reviewers The official new article firewall "Nosotros process, corroborate, or tag newly created pages" |
New Page Reviewer (patroller user group) is a special rights user group. Reviewers work with the New Pages Feed[1] and the Page Curation Tool to procedure, approve, or tag newly created pages.[2]
In gild to better control the quality of new pages—to accost common unwanted content such as spam, copyvios and nonsense, and also to encourage good religion new users—the current system that was developed in collaboration with the Wikimedia Foundation in 2011 has been updated and improved. A new user grouping, New Page Reviewer, for qualified reviewers, was created in October 2016.
In that location are currently 711 New Page Reviewers, which makes the full number of users with this permission 1,761 (the rest are administrators, who automatically have this permission).
New Page Reviewer
Editors will usually need to have been registered users of the English Wikipedia for at least 90 days, and take made at to the lowest degree 500 non-deleted edits to mainspace. They will too need to exist able to demonstrate from their editing history that they have sufficient experience, and accept the ability to communicate in an appropriate way with new users.
Obtaining the user right
Users applying for the New Page Patroller flag at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions are expected to have been registered for at least 90 days and to have fabricated at least 500 uncontested edits to mainspace articles. This is a guideline threshold and does not guarantee automatic access to the right. This is similar to the application process to obtain rights as a Pending Changes Reviewer or Rollbacker, where the user's editing history is checked and, if appropriate, the right is granted either on a probationary or fourth dimension limited basis or indefinitely by a reviewing administrator. On expiry of timed rights, users tin can reapply whereupon their patrolling history will be reviewed. Administrators are accorded discretion to grant the right even where the ninety-twenty-four hour period threshold is not fully met—typically washed when a review of the person'due south edits betoken they are a strong candidate. For more than details, please see New pages patrol and read the instructions at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions.
Guidelines for granting
- The editor should be a registered Wikipedia user for at to the lowest degree 90 days.
- The editor should have fabricated 500 undeleted edits to mainspace that clearly demonstrate knowledge of page quality control. Participation in deletion processes (AfD likewise equally PROD and CSD tagging) or AfC is peculiarly helpful for demonstrating this knowledge. Edits and/or user status on other Foundation projects are not taken into consideration.
- The editor should have experience with moving pages in accordance with guidelines.
- The editor should have no behavioral blocks or 3RR violations for a span of half-dozen months prior to applying.
- The editor must review pages solely on a volunteer basis.
The above items are guidelines and numerical compliance alone does non constitute a right to the user grouping. An administrator may also grant page reviewer rights to users they otherwise deem competent or may request experience above and beyond the to a higher place criteria. Administrators also typically similar to see consistent recent activity on Wikipedia to ensure that reviewers are familiar with current policy and guidelines.
Guidelines for revocation
The user correct can be revoked for violating any of the in a higher place behave standards and for other misconduct. Additionally, it can be revoked at any time past an ambassador without any procedure or prior observe in whatever of the following circumstances:
- The editor has demonstrated a blueprint of performing evidently controversial reviews without first determining consensus.
- The editor has demonstrated a pattern of failing to practice sufficient care when reviewing pages, resulting in new users being offended or discouraged.
- The editor has used the permission to gain the upper hand in disputes.
- The editor has performed any blatant vandalism (not limited to page reviewer vandalism).
- The editor has failed to report to an administrator later on noticing unauthorized use of their account or otherwise neglected business relationship security practices.
- The editor has been inactive for 12 months or more.
- The editor has accepted or solicited payment in return for reviews.
Additionally, the right may be removed immediately at the cocky-request of the editor. Appeals of revocation should be made in the first instance to the revoking administrator, failing which, a further appeal tin can be made at the Administrators' noticeboard (not ANI).
How does this affect new pages?
All new pages, redirects, drafts, accepted AfC submissions, and other pages moved to mainspace will be displayed in the New Pages Feed. They will be displayed in article space simply will not be indexed for search engines until curated by an authorised reviewer.
In that location are plans to include a new feature in the Curation tool that will enable reviewers to motion to the Draft namespace any new articles that, while not being suitable yet for immediate publication, show the potential for being accepted if the creator is immune more time for development. Currently, for the time-being the same task could be performed with this script. 
Note: This script is to be used with discretion; information technology is not a catch-all for non knowing what to do with a new page.
Reviewers are encouraged to make frequent utilise of the existing message to creator tool. It is essential that new creators are encouraged to continue with their acceptable new articles.
Triage
New Folio Review is essentially the get-go (and only) firewall confronting totally unwanted content and the place to broadly take articles that may not be perfect but practice not demand to exist deleted. New Folio Reviewers should not feel obligated to mentor new users or complete their articles. In that location are other venues better suited for these tasks such every bit the Teahouse, help desk and Articles for Creation to which new editors should be directed for in depth aid. Help:Your starting time article, Help:Introduction, Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia, the Wikipedia Hazard, and other help pages are as well available. When drafts are canonical at AfC and moved to the mainspace they will need a final check through New Pages Review. It is very possible that regular reviewers from the AfC team will use for the New Page Reviewer flag; this is highly desirable given their related expertise.
Newsletter
By adding the userbox below, you will occasionally receive news of new features to the software and issues fixes. If y'all practice not want to add together the userbox or icon below, only wish to receive the newsletter and are a flagged reviewer, you can add together Category:Wikipedia new page reviewers to your user page.
Userboxes, top icon and script
New folio reviewers have the option of using a user script that combines the two main Page Curation features, namely the Special:NewPagesFeed and the curation toolbar. The erstwhile Special:NewPages feed tin can be accessed using this script and this script without the patrolled pages hidden. Holders of the New Folio Reviewer user right can put a userbox on their user page. It populates a new category.
Do non add these userboxes if you accept not been granted the correct.
| New Pages Review Userbox | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authorised New Page Reviewers may wish to put one of the userboxes on their user page: {{User wikipedia/New page reviewer}}
{{User new pages reviewer since}}
| |||||||
Statistics
To view the list of the near agile reviewers over a time-span, you may use this bot-generated feed.
Notes
- ^ Reviewers can use the Folio curation script to become a link to the feed in their summit toolbar
- ^ Wikipedia, 24 Oct 2016
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers
0 Response to "Wikipedia Do All New Articles Have to Be Reviewed"
Post a Comment